Multiple literacies/New Literacies/Multimodality
Synthesis:
The
21st century brings many new technologies that require new and
multiple literacies. Literacy is defined by the society and the mediums at
hand, so literacy today is very complex and varied. These literacies require
readers to make broad, cross-cultural connections, to problem solve, and to
constantly adapt to the new technology. People must interact with multimedia to
critique, analyze and create it. Purposes and audiences vary greatly in today’s
literacies. In addition, readers and writers must be aware of the ethical
responsibilities that accompany the mediums.
Kim and Kamil
This
text covers some studies about using computers in the classroom. The studies
found that in regards to literacy learning, students learn best with mandatory
assistance programs put in place. Students do not learn as much or utilize the
materials if such programs are voluntary. These programs need to have supports
built in and they need to be highly structured. Direct, explicit instruction is
crucial for student success. Students need direct instruction in regards to
visuals. Many adolescents do not know how to read or understand visuals. Most
children and a lot of adults don’t even look at visuals unless directly
instructed to do so. Computers can cause students anxiety. This can be
reflective of experience, age, and gender. Also, socioeconomic status has an
impact on the availability of experience and exposure to computers. However,
novelty can also have an impact on motivation. Older children may not be able
to see the viability of learning with technology as much as younger students.
The more experience students have with computers, the less likely they are to
experience computer anxiety. Students need to be comfortable using both the
hardware and software on the computer. Interestingly, there is a stereotype
that students whom like to use the computer are the smart kids. Also, boys have
more positive responses to the computer than girls do, but it is not clear why.
Motivation to write greatly improves when children have access to computers,
but direct instruction and guidance is still needed. Computers allow students
to participate in many social learning activities. However, students might not
always see the link between the various forms of writing they do on the computer
and their learning for school.
Coiro
This
text emphasizes the fact that technology is drastically changing. Teachers need
to keep up with the changing technologies that are related to school work and
personal use in order to keep current with their students and be able to best
assist them with learning tasks. Whenever possible, students should be allowed
to work collaboratively. The teacher should work as a facilitator when
possible: this is when the most learning occurs. However, teachers also need to
explicitly teach and model thinking patterns and strategies for students.
Talking out loud can be very useful. Students learn best when the technology
skills are focused around a specific content area task. They should use
technology for math, science, social studies, and reading. In addition, online
reading skills sometimes do not transfer from students print reading skills.
These connections need to be explicitly taught. Students also need to be taught
internet text features and how they are the same and different from other
informational texts. Students need to be taught the process of effectively
searching for and evaluating texts found online. Students own experiences and interests with
various internet texts need to be valued and used when possible to make
connections. Students need to work together on problem-based questions in order
to research and better develop both technological skills and reading skills.
Hinchman & Sheridan-Thomas Chapter
4
This
chapter discusses the various discourses that students encounter. The primary
discourse is usually their home discourse while their secondary discourse is
usually their school discourse. Oftentimes, students perceive some degree of
mismatch when these two discourses are perceived as different. Students have
various reactions to this mismatch. The degree of the mismatch can influence
the degree of their reactions. Students bring all sorts of knowledge, behavior
expectations, world views, personal preferences, experiences, social norms with
them to school: this is part of their primary discourse. When this does not
match the discourse that is given at school students can reject the second,
shut down, go back and forth, or reject the home discourse in order to become
more accepted. In addition, there are also borderland discourses which seem to
occur among peers and they are somewhat of a mix between home and school
discourses in which students can negotiate these identities.
Hinchman & Sheridan-Thomas Chapter
16
This
chapter talked about the issue of multimodalities. This refers to using various
types of texts in order to offer different perspectives when learning about
content. The chapter followed the case study of a teacher who was teaching a
unit on the Little Rock Nine: she used books, articles, movies, and photos. Teaching
this way can make abstract elements in printed text more explicit by first
showing how they work in a visual like a movie or a photograph. Using multiple
modalities can make content more realistic and engaging for students.
Response:
Text to Text: Chapter 4
especially reminds me of the readings for my culture, language and literacy
class that discusses how students of diverse cultures and ELL students learn
English and schools and some of the problems that they face. The chapters are
all interconnected to learning and diversifying: changing with the times of
diverse people and diverse technology and media.
Text to Self: These texts
remind me that I need to be more mindful of teaching technology explicitly and
not just expecting the kids to know how to use it. These texts inspire me to
work towards a more open classroom concept when technology is available.
Text to World: The world is
changing and there are new technologies sooner than schools can adjust;
however, when students enter the workforce employers will expect them to be
able to find, analyze, and use information to their advantage. SO, teachers
need to prepare them to be flexible and to be critical thinkers and
problem-solvers.
Questions:
1.
What are you favorite technologies to use in the classroom? Different grade
levels?
2.
Compare/contrast- How do we teach school discourse effectively in the higher
grades and lower grades?
3.
How do you/would you teach internet credibility and internet safety?
1. I liked using the smart board for varies lessons and centers. I also used the listening center. I had computers so I would have a center with computers everyday of some type.
ReplyDelete2. I think there are a lot of similarities when teaching discourse in upper and lower grades. In lower grades I try to make it more of a celebration of who everyone is. Trying to do projects that get kids thinking about differences and who they are. If I was teaching older students, I might actually teach about the history of different social backgrounds and struggles each group has overcome. Then try to do a lot of writings that get kids thinking about who they are and what struggles they've overcome. I think the old you get the more specific and open you become about discourse groups.
3. For younger kids, I believe there is a garfield video clip that talks about all the dangers of the internet and how to be safe. I'd play that and we'd discuss how to be safe and practice those skills on the computer/smartboard. With pre-k there isn't a ton of opportunities they are on the computer alone. I don't want to terrify them, but just to tell them to be aware of what you are doing on the internet. Don't tell you name and where you are. But this isn't really a problem with 4 year olds since they can't type!
1. I have the most experience with using a computer and projector/ smart board. I think the smart board is so beneficial!! It can be used for instruction and also for student centers. This experience was in a first grade classroom.
ReplyDelete2. Discourse is all about diversity. We can teach this very early on in school. We are all different and come from different cultures and backgrounds, but we all deserve to be respected for exactly who we are. I agree with Kailtin- as the students progress throughout school, discourse study can become more historical.
3. Internet safety is very important! I think anytime you go into the computer lab, the students need to have a set task that they are supposed to accomplish, and a specific site(s) that they are allowed to access. This needs to be constantly enforced and monitored while in the computer lab. If students misuse the computer privilege, it should be taken away.