Assessment
Synthesis:
Hinchman and Sheridan-Thomas Chapter
19
Chapter
19 discusses the issue of struggling readers and especially in regards to assessment.
It emphasizes the need for frequent assessment with feedback in order for
students and teachers to view growth and to be successful. Assessment data must
be applied to teaching. The chapter focuses on the CARI method of assessment as
well as vocabulary. Basically, students are assessed through the use of
multiple questions to be answered by students, peers, and teachers. Literacy
must be defined, measured, and tracked for each content area course. These assessments
need to be authentic and meaningful. Teachers need to work within the ZPD in
order for students to be successful. This chapter includes several helpful
questions in the forms of tables and check-sheets for general education,
reading and thinking skills, and content area skills. Also the vocabulary
charts and KWLH strategies for each content area are very useable.
Afflerbach
Assessment
of reading skills is a complicated task. It often involves teachers asking the
correct types of questions. Assessing reading comprehension is very difficult. Usually,
a multiple-choice test does not really measure all that a student knows about
the content. This text covers different types of assessments. The four main
types are: performance, portfolios, observation & questioning, and standardized
tests. Performance assessments require rubrics and examples to efficiently
implement as well as clear expectations. Student performances are an authentic
and engaging way for students to show their understanding of concepts and
skills. Portfolios help to show progress and growth and can be arranged in many
different ways: either in print format or saved to technology. In addition,
observation and questioning can be very in-depth and time consuming but also
yield results that show accurate and reliable data from which instructional
changes can be made. This can be difficult to do and is greatly helped with
written and verbal assessments. Standardized testing has its own pros and cons.
Although they are designed to give all students the same equal experience; it
does not always adequately measure students reading ability or learning. Some
of these tests may still be around for the sake of tradition, and are not
always useful for teachers to use the information.
Moje and Hinchman
This
text discusses the issue of having cultural responsive practices in pedagogy. Teachers
need to know their students. They need to know not only their strengths and
weaknesses, but also what kinds of experiences are relevant to them and what
cultures shape their identities. Teachers must be careful not to assume these
things about their students because they might risk alienating them or embarrassing
them. Teachers need to be able to design lessons that center around problems
that students find both authentic and interesting: usually these have to do
with community issues. Students need the opportunity to experience different
perspectives and cultures. Focusing on what students bring to the world and
what they are interested in helps them to genuinely become a part of their
learning. It is crucial to build a positive classroom in order for students to
be successful and to be able tp participate in this type of learning.
Response:
Text to Self: As a hopeful
future reading specialist, the Chapter 19 from Hinchman and Sheridan-Thomas is
enlightening about the subject of assessment. The Afflerbach text was also helpful in that it went into detail
about the different types of assessment which would be useful to me both as a
reading specialist and as a teacher to know what options are available.
Text to Text: This text
discusses several of the issues we have read about before in regards to
struggling students, questions to ask, content area problems, and vocabulary
instruction.
Text to World: Assessment is
a big part of today’s schools whether we like it or not. Standardized high
stakes tests are especially relevant as they have been a source of controversy
in recent years. Nevertheless, it is important to look for accurate, reliable,
and useable ways to assess student learning. Most importantly, we must be
mindful of audiences and include the student in their own learning. Metacognitive
thinking should be a crucial aspect of their learning in order to foster
accountability.
Questions:
1. How do you engage students in metacognitive
thinking in your classroom?
2. What types of assessments do you use/would you
like to use?
3. What types of cultural responsive practices do
you use/would you like to use?